3. Submit for Approval

Navigate the review process with confidence. This guide shows you how to prepare your agent for a higher chance of approval.

​

I. Content Review Criteria

​

1. Agent Name

✅ Requirements:

• Clearly conveys the agent’s core functionality or key value proposition
• Must not be vague or meaningless
• Must not contain advertisements, contact information, or unlicensed brand names

❌ Examples (Rejection):

• AI Tools
• Gernel Voice AI Agent
• DO NOT Open

---

​

2. Overview (One-Sentence Summary)

✅ Requirements:

• Clearly states what the agent does in one sentence
• Enables users to instantly grasp its value

✅ Example (Approved):

• “An AI writing assistant that auto-generates SEO-friendly blog posts.”

❌ Example (Rejection):

• “A very powerful writing tool.” (Too vague)

---

​

3. Description (Detailed Description)

✅ Must Include All of the Following:

• Target users (e.g., “Ideal for content creators”)
• Use cases (e.g., “Writing WeChat official accounts or Xiaohongshu captions”)
• Key functionalities
• Output format (e.g., “Generates an 800-word blog post + image suggestions”)

❌ Rejection Criteria:

• Missing any of the above elements
• Contains external links that redirect users off-platform
• Excessively long (>100 words). (Note: Most current agents are image-generation focused and do not require lengthy explanations.)

---

​

4. Advantages

✅ Requirements:

• Presented as bullet points
• Each point highlights a distinct, non-generic advantage

✅ Examples (Approved):

• ✔️ One-click publishing across multiple platforms
• ✔️ Auto-generates titles and SEO keywords

❌ Examples (Rejection):

• ❌ “Intelligent and efficient”
• ❌ “Great user experience” (Too vague/boilerplate)

---

​

5. Key Features

✅ Requirements:

• Bullet-point format, ordered by importance
• Specific, tangible capabilities — no abstract concepts

✅ Examples (Approved):

• ✔️ Input a topic → outputs a complete blog post
• ✔️ Supports bilingual output (Chinese/English)

❌ Examples (Rejection):

• ❌ “Powerful AI engine”
• ❌ “Intelligent analytical capability”

---

​

6. Prompts (Usage Guidance)

✅ Requirements:

• Instructs users on how to phrase inputs for optimal results
• Provides concrete examples (e.g., “Input: ‘I want to write an article about running.’”)

❌ Rejection if:

• Left blank or only says “Please enter content.”

---

​

7. Showcase / Cover Image

✅ Requirements:

• Clearly displays the agent’s actual output
• No irrelevant stock images, placeholders, or excessive watermarks
• Supports aspect ratios: 1:1 and 16:10
• Resolution ≥ 512×512 px

❌ Examples (Rejection):

• Blurry screenshots with unreadable text
• Unauthorized or functionally irrelevant images

---

​

II. Safety Review

All content must comply with the following: ❌ No explicit, pornographic, or violent content ❌ No references to politics, religion, or sensitive events ❌ No privacy violations, fraud inducement, or false advertising ❌ No covert promotion (e.g., unsolicited links to Discord, X/Twitter, Facebook, or external websites)

Note: External references (e.g., cited sources) are acceptable if necessary for context — but aggressive self-promotion or personal contact info is prohibited.

---

​

III. Experience Evaluation Criteria

​

1. Language Consistency

⚠️ Rejection if:

• Unjustified language mixing (e.g., English input → Chinese output)

---

​

2. Functional Availability

​

File Upload Support

⚠️ Rejection if:

• Claims image processing support but fails on PNG/JPG

​

Output File Download

• Generated images, PDFs, videos, etc., must be downloadable
• Verification: Click “Download” → confirm successful file save

Note: As long as users can access/retrieve the output, the requirement is satisfied.

​

Clickable Output URLs

• All links must be functional and lead to valid, safe destinations
• Must not be broken (e.g., http://error) or redirect to malicious/blacklisted sites

---

​

3. Ease of Use

User input requirements must be reasonable: ⚠️ Rejection if:

• Entry barrier is excessively high, harming UX
• Requires users to manually edit/Photoshop input images

---

​

4. Minimum Output Quality

---

​

IV. Common Rejection Cases

• Issue Type: ❌ Vague Information
  • Example: Name: “Smart Writing Tool” — no specific functionality described
• Issue Type: ❌ Language Inconsistency
  • Example: English input → full Chinese output
• Issue Type: ❌ Missing Functionality
  • Example: Claims “PDF parsing supported”, but upload fails with error
• Issue Type: ❌ Low-Quality Output
  • Example: Generated image: 256×256, blurry
• Issue Type: ❌ Safety Violation
  • Example: Showcase image contains politically sensitive symbols
• Issue Type: ❌ Covert Promotion
  • Example: Output includes: “Add me on Telegram: xxx”
• Issue Type: ❌ Insufficient Runtime Stability
  • Requirement: Each submitted version must have 5 consecutive successful runs before UTC 23:59 on the day of submission
  • Example 1: New version has only 3 successful runs → Rejected
  • Example 2: New version has 5 runs but only 4 successful and 1 failed → Rejected (runs must be consecutive)

---